Historical tests
Historical reports show how a fixed EA configuration behaved on past market data under the test environment recorded in that report. They are useful for comparison, not prediction.
Testing methodology
The goal is to keep historical tests, demo use, and public real-world observation clearly separated.
Historical reports show how a fixed EA configuration behaved on past market data under the test environment recorded in that report. They are useful for comparison, not prediction.
A fixed-amount test and a percentage-risk test are different experiments. Compare them only when the risk basis, starting balance, and drawdown are visible.
Net result is never shown alone. Maximum drawdown, trade count, win rate, test period, and profit factor provide essential context.
The public result board contains closed trades from a testing-stage account. It is a separate evidence category and should not be combined with historical test totals.
Each public test has a stable profile ID, pair, variant, risk basis, date range, and imported source-file name. Private access settings are not exposed publicly.
Execution, spreads, data quality, broker conditions, software versions, and market behaviour can change. No test removes the possibility of loss.
The pages load the generated VantaBox setup library created from the existing imported MT5 reports. No separate marketing totals are maintained in the page templates.