AI Super Apps and Invisible Wealth-Tech
Chatbots and assistants are becoming the interface for all financial operations. But is this truly a benefit — or a double-edged sword?
Every new technology first feels like magic. The internet meant freedom. The smartphone meant convenience. Now AI assistants manage our money: allocating budgets, investing the remainder, optimizing decisions, and helping us avoid emotional mistakes.
It sounds like the perfect future. But every technology is a double-edged sword. On one side, life becomes easier. On the other, there is a subtle risk of degradation: when decisions are made “in chat,” people may gradually lose the habit of analysis, doubt, and personal responsibility.
The Labor Market: Another Layer of Risk
Here lies the paradox. Blind dependence on AI can weaken thinking — but refusing to use AI makes a person less competitive. The labor market is already shifting: those who win are not the ones doing everything manually, nor the ones delegating everything blindly, but those who understand how to control the tool.
- formulating precise prompts and providing context
- interpreting outputs instead of blindly accepting them
- verifying results and understanding model limitations
- using AI as an amplifier — not a replacement — for thinking
A new form of literacy is emerging — AI literacy. Not using AI is becoming a risk. But trusting it without understanding is a risk as well.
💬 A question to reflect on: do you want AI to save your time — or eventually replace your ability to think about money?
